Science built on the incompleteness

Once upon a time, I used to think that every data on a journal article were true. I believed that science was perfectly generated by the only truth.  As time went by, I came to know the incompleteness of everything made by people. Thus, all data on articles are incomplete because they are shown by incomplete people. The most important way of reading a paper is to decide its credibility by yourself finally. You can decide whether the data shown by the author is exactly true. Even if you think a data to be failure, you have to take a look at how the author discusses it. The skill to see through someone's mistake will progress your insight. In addition, there are many cases that both you and other are correct. We can sometimes get more suggestions by incompleteness than completeness.